TSTP Solution File: SET621^5 by Leo-III-SAT---1.7.10

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III-SAT---1.7.10
% Problem  : SET621^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  7 10:50:09 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 5.25s 2.52s
% Output   : Refutation 5.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   24
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   52 (  13 unt;   6 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  199 (  17 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  434 ( 102   ~; 105   |;  47   &; 180   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   12 (  12   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (  10   ^   9   !;   0   ?;  19   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(a_type,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(sk1_type,type,
    sk1: a > $o ).

thf(sk2_type,type,
    sk2: a > $o ).

thf(sk3_type,type,
    sk3: a > $o ).

thf(sk4_type,type,
    sk4: a ).

thf(sk5_type,type,
    sk5: $o ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: a > $o,B: a > $o,C: a > $o] :
      ( ( ^ [D: a] :
            ( ( ( ( A @ D )
                & ~ ( B @ D ) )
              | ( ( B @ D )
                & ~ ( A @ D ) ) )
            & ~ ( C @ D ) ) )
      = ( ^ [D: a] :
            ( ( ( A @ D )
              & ~ ( ( B @ D )
                  | ( C @ D ) ) )
            | ( ( B @ D )
              & ~ ( ( A @ D )
                  | ( C @ D ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cBOOL_PROP_97_pme) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: a > $o,B: a > $o,C: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [D: a] :
              ( ( ( ( A @ D )
                  & ~ ( B @ D ) )
                | ( ( B @ D )
                  & ~ ( A @ D ) ) )
              & ~ ( C @ D ) ) )
        = ( ^ [D: a] :
              ( ( ( A @ D )
                & ~ ( ( B @ D )
                    | ( C @ D ) ) )
              | ( ( B @ D )
                & ~ ( ( A @ D )
                    | ( C @ D ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ! [A: a > $o,B: a > $o,C: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [D: a] :
              ( ( ( ( A @ D )
                  & ~ ( B @ D ) )
                | ( ( B @ D )
                  & ~ ( A @ D ) ) )
              & ~ ( C @ D ) ) )
        = ( ^ [D: a] :
              ( ( ( A @ D )
                & ~ ( ( B @ D )
                    | ( C @ D ) ) )
              | ( ( B @ D )
                & ~ ( ( A @ D )
                    | ( C @ D ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: a] :
          ( ( ( ( sk1 @ A )
              & ~ ( sk2 @ A ) )
            | ( ( sk2 @ A )
              & ~ ( sk1 @ A ) ) )
          & ~ ( sk3 @ A ) ) )
   != ( ^ [A: a] :
          ( ( ( sk1 @ A )
            & ~ ( ( sk2 @ A )
                | ( sk3 @ A ) ) )
          | ( ( sk2 @ A )
            & ~ ( ( sk1 @ A )
                | ( sk3 @ A ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: a] :
          ( ( ( ( sk1 @ A )
              & ~ ( sk2 @ A ) )
            | ( ( sk2 @ A )
              & ~ ( sk1 @ A ) ) )
          & ~ ( sk3 @ A ) ) )
   != ( ^ [A: a] :
          ( ( ( sk1 @ A )
            & ~ ( ( sk2 @ A )
                | ( sk3 @ A ) ) )
          | ( ( sk2 @ A )
            & ~ ( ( sk1 @ A )
                | ( sk3 @ A ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
          & ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
        | ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
          & ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ) )
      & ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
   != ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
        & ~ ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
            | ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) )
      | ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
        & ~ ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
            | ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[5]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
          & ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
        | ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
          & ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ) )
      & ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
      & ~ ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
          | ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) )
    | ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
      & ~ ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
          | ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ( ~ sk5
    | ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[8]) ).

thf(42,plain,
    ( ~ sk5
    | ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ( ~ ( ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
            & ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
          | ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
            & ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ) )
        & ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
    | ~ ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
          & ~ ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
              | ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) )
        | ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
          & ~ ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
              | ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk3 @ sk4 )
    | ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[7]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ( ~ sk5
    | ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
    | ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[8]) ).

thf(50,plain,
    ( ~ sk5
    | ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[30]) ).

thf(63,plain,
    ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ~ sk5
    | ( ( sk3 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[12,50]) ).

thf(64,plain,
    ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ~ sk5 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[63:[]]) ).

thf(237,plain,
    ( ~ sk5
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[42,64]) ).

thf(238,plain,
    ( ~ sk5
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[237:[]]) ).

thf(35,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | sk5
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[8]) ).

thf(41,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | sk5
    | ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[35]) ).

thf(59,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | sk5
    | ( sk3 @ sk4 )
    | ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[41,12]) ).

thf(60,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | sk5
    | ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[59:[]]) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
    | sk5
    | ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[8]) ).

thf(48,plain,
    ( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
    | sk5 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[31]) ).

thf(82,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | sk5
    | ( ( sk3 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[60,48]) ).

thf(83,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | sk5 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[82:[]]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk3 @ sk4 )
    | ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[7]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(110,plain,
    ( sk5
    | ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk3 @ sk4 )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[83,14]) ).

thf(111,plain,
    ( sk5
    | ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[110:[]]) ).

thf(247,plain,
    ( sk5
    | ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ( ( sk3 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[111,48]) ).

thf(248,plain,
    ( sk5
    | ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[247:[]]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | sk5
    | ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[8]) ).

thf(47,plain,
    ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | sk5
    | ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(100,plain,
    ( sk5
    | ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[83,47]) ).

thf(101,plain,
    ( sk5
    | ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[100:[]]) ).

thf(287,plain,
    ( sk5
    | ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[248,101]) ).

thf(288,plain,
    sk5,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[287:[]]) ).

thf(317,plain,
    ( ~ $true
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[238,288]) ).

thf(318,plain,
    sk1 @ sk4,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[317]) ).

thf(323,plain,
    ( ( ( ( $true
          & ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
        | ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
          & ~ $true ) )
      & ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
   != ( ( $true
        & ~ ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
            | ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) )
      | ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
        & ~ ( $true
            | ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[6,318]) ).

thf(324,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
      & ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
   != ( ~ ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
          | ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[323]) ).

thf(319,plain,
    ( ~ $true
    | ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[50,288]) ).

thf(320,plain,
    ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[319]) ).

thf(327,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
      & ~ $false )
   != ( ~ ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
          | $false ) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[324,320]) ).

thf(328,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[327]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10  % Problem  : SET621^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon May  6 20:51:09 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.91/0.92  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.30/1.09  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (165ms). 
% 1.30/1.10  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.71/1.42  % [INFO] 	 nitpick registered as external prover. 
% 1.71/1.43  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.97/1.49  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.97/1.51  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.97/1.51  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 1.97/1.52  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.97/1.52  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 5.25/2.51  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 5.25/2.51  % Time passed: 2019ms (effective reasoning time: 1406ms)
% 5.25/2.51  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 5.25/2.52  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 5.25/2.52  % No. of inferences in proof: 46
% 5.25/2.52  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2019 ms resp. 1406 ms w/o parsing
% 5.25/2.58  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.25/2.58  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------